Canada's Nineteenth Century Chess Visitors I: Bird and Mackenzie
By Stephen Wright
(All the games in this article are available in a PGN file.)
Canada is a relatively young nation: unsurprisingly, organized chess in this country is also a comparatively recent development. The first
meeting of the Canadian Chess Association took place in 1872, and the first Canadian champion was crowned in 1873. Chess clubs had existed
before confederation; for our purposes the most significant was the Montreal Chess Club, founded in 1844, although there is evidence to suggest
a forerunner in the city some ten years before that date. Then as now (with a few notable exceptions), it was the largest urban
centres which tended to attract the strongest and greatest numbers of chess players. In the nineteenth century, indeed until the early 1970s, the
largest city in Canada was Montreal; thus, the Montreal Chess Club was a destination for the chess masters who visited Canada in the last
quarter of the century. Given the club's importance, we should meet some of its leading members:
Thomas
Workman (18131889), a founding member of the Montreal Chess Club, businessman, MP, president of Molson's Bank and
Sun Mutual Life Insurance;
Henry Aspinwall Howe (18151900), LLD, Canadian champion in 1877 and 1883, principal of the McGill High School;
William Henry
Hicks
(18161899), Canadian champion in 1874, principal of the McGill Normal School (now part of the Faculty of Education, McGill University);
Joseph William Shaw (18341897), Canadian champion in 1881, organizer of the first round-robin correspondence tournament in
North America;
John Henderson (18361896), placed second in the Canadian championships of 1881-1882 and 1884, winner of Shaw's correspondence
tournament and a subsequent event run by Dr. Isaac Ryall of the Hamilton Chess Club, prize-winning problem composer, mayor of St. Liboire for eight years;
Jacob Gottschalk Ascher (18411912), Canadian champion in 1878, tied for first in 1883, businessman.
McCord Museum photographs of Workman and
a group shot of the Canadian Chess Association
in 1889 which includes all the others mentioned above.
As can be seen, competitive chess in those years was largely the domain of those belonging to the upper echelons of society. It says much for the
erudition of these gentlemen that four of them wrote chess columns at one time or another: Hicks (Canadian Illustrated News),
Shaw (Canadian Spectator), Henderson (Canadian Spectator, [Montreal] Gazette), and Ascher ([Montreal] Daily
Witness, New Dominion Monthly, Sport).
Henry Edward Bird (1830-1908)
Canada's first chess visitor of note was the English master Henry Bird. Bird was a railway accountant by profession, and as a junior partner in the
firm of Coleman, Turquand, Youngs & Co. (a distant predecessor to the present-day Ernest and Young) he travelled to Canada in 1860 to work on the books of
the Great Western Railway, whose main corridor of operation was Windsor to Niagara Falls. Bird's professional duties took him to North America several more
times in the 1860s; in 1866 he was forced to cut short a match in London with Steinitz, trailing by the score of 7-5 with 5 draws, to attend to business
matters on this continent. Presumably Bird would not have missed an opportunity to play some chess on these trips, but no record of his chess activities
in Canada during this time has come down to us.
By the mid-1870s Bird was living in New York, having largely retired to indulge in his favourite pastime. In 1876 he participated in the 4th American
Congress (Philadelphia), and the Cafe International and Clipper tournaments (both in New York). Taking advantage of the master's relative
proximity, Thomas Workman invited Bird to visit Montreal, and he duly arrived in January, 1877. Bird sojourned in the area for over three weeks, mainly in
Montreal but also including several days in Sherbrooke. No indication of the cost involved is given, but writing fifteen years later John Henderson noted
of Bird's visit that "then, as now, we had several liberal patrons of the game who vied with each other in making the period of his stay both profitable
and agreeable." [Gazette, 19 November 1892]
"The chess players of Montreal show a great inclination to make the most of the visit of Mr. Bird to Montreal, and he is just as willing to make any
arrangements which his friendly opponents may suggest before he leaves the city." [Canadian Illustrated News, 10 February 1877] The 'arrangements'
consisted of simultaneous displays, consultation games, and handicapped and offhand games. The various media reports occasionally differ on the numbers
involved, or who won from the master on a given day, but Bird gave three simultaneous displays in Montreal, as follows:
22 January 19 boards, +11 =2 -6 (or 15 boards, +9 =2 -4)
27/30 January 17 boards, +12 =2 -3
10 February 25 boards, +21 =2 -2
On 23 January Bird contested four games simultaneously against two or three opponents consulting on each board:
Game A - Howe, Saunders, Barry
Game B - Hicks, Henderson, Watkins
Game C - Ascher, Workman, Shaw
Game D - Atkinson, Hall
The games were finished on 27 January with Bird scoring +2 (C and D) =1 (A) -1 (B). It should be noted the practice of adjourning a display for a dinner
break or if the evening was going too late was not unusual, and presumably reflected the prevalent attitude toward adjournments - receiving analytical
assistance was considered unethical, and in some events players were banned from studying adjourned positions.
Presumably the master also played many offhand games during his stay, but these are generally not mentioned in the newspaper reports of the time. We do
know of at least two games at knight odds that were published - see below. Detailed accounts of Bird's time in Sherbrooke are not contained in any of the
newpapers I have access to, but two figures are given - a total of fifty games played with only one loss during the visit, including a seventeen-board
simultaneous in which Bird won every game. One incident from the display was described in the July 1877 New Dominion Monthly:
In the preliminaries it was understood that no player should move the pieces during Mr. Bird's absence at the other boards; but one gentleman broke
through this rule, leading to a laughable episode. Mr. Bird had passed him twice, and coming round the third time rather quicker than Major M. had
expected, found the board in a state of utter confusion, nearly every piece having been moved. Mr. Bird had left his king on e2 in a perfectly safe
condition, guarded by Q, both Rs and two minor pieces! What was his astonishment to find his king at e7 away over in the enemy's territory, and in
imminent danger of mate! Major M., in Mr. Bird's absence, had been following out some complicated analysis involving some sixteen moves, as it appeared,
making of course very bad moves for Mr. Bird, and hunting the latter's poor king all over the board! Major M., caught in the act, very red and guilty,
stammered out an apology. "Mr Bird," says he, "I beg your pardon, I am really very sorry, but will you be kind enough to pass me again? I really don't
recollect quite where your king was! The next time you come round I will try to get him back into his place!" This, said with perfect politeness and
with earnest gravity of countenance, was too much for the equanimity of every spectator a shout of laughter was heard on every side! Mr. Bird said it
was the most comical chess incident he had ever known in his life. [Emphasis in the original.]
According to newspaper reports the Montreal players who won from Mr. Bird were Ascher, Atkinson, Barry, Henderson, Hicks, Howe, Saunders, and
Workman, while Barry, Hall, Hicks, Henderson, Shaw, and Workman achieved draws. Results in simultaneous displays might not seem too important to us
now, but at the time the percentage achieved by different clubs against the same visiting master was a way of comparing relative strengths and gaining
bragging rights. The Montrealers were pleased to learn that in a recent twenty-board display New Yorkers were only able to take one game from Bird: "We
have good reason for saying that in the opinion of Mr. Bird the play on the part of the Montreal Club may compare favourably with that of any other body of
players with whom he has contested during his visit to this continent." [Canadian Illustrated News, 3 February 1877]
And what of the games? According to the contemporary Dictionary of National Biography, Bird was "well known for his rapidity (R. J. Buckley
says he once played three games in ten minutes at Simpson's, scoring one and a half), dash, and eccentric openings....Unfortunately his patience and
judgment were very inferior to his power of combination." From this description one would expect some sparkling combinations, with the occasional
'accident' caused by rushed or superficial thinking. It is dangerous to project a generalized comment such as this onto a master's play, but
some of the games exhibit the mentioned traits:
[Event "Game - QN odds"]
[Site "Montreal"]
[Date "1877.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Bird, Henry E"]
[Black "Shaw, Joseph W"]
[Result "1-0"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/R1BQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1"]
[PlyCount "31"]
[EventDate "1877.01.29"]
[EventCountry "CAN"]
[SourceDate "2009.02.21"]
1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. Nf3 dxe4 4. Nxe5 Bd6 5. d4 exd3 6. Bxd3 Bxe5 7. fxe5 Ne7
8. O-O O-O 9. Bg5 Qd4+ 10. Kh1 Qxe5 11. Bxh7+ Kxh7 12. Qh5+ Kg8 13. Rae1 Qc5
14. Rxe7 f6 15. Rxg7+ Kxg7 16. Bh6+ {[L'Opinion Publique, 15 February 1877]}
1-0
[Event "Simul"]
[Site "Montreal"]
[Date "1877.01.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Atkinson, William"]
[Black "Bird, Henry E"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "D00"]
[Annotator "Rev. C.E. Ranken"]
[PlyCount "33"]
[EventDate "1877.01.??"]
[EventCountry "CAN"]
[SourceDate "2009.02.24"]
1. d4 d5 2. Nc3 g6 3. Bf4 Bg7 4. Nf3 Nc6 5. e3 {White could now win a pawn by
Nb5, and at the next move also, which both players seem to have overlooked.}
Nf6 6. Be2 O-O 7. O-O Nh5 8. Bg3 Nxg3 9. fxg3 Kh8 10. h3 f5 11. Kh2 e5 12. Nxe5
Nxe5 13. dxe5 Bxe5 14. Nxd5 Bxb2 {Weak; he should have played Be6 or Qd6. Mr.
Bird's next move simply throws away the game, which is, on his part, far
beneath his usual force.} 15. Bc4 Bxa1 16. Qxa1+ Kg8 ({This was, of course,
played without reflection, but anything else would have met with the same
result; for, if} 16... Rf6 17. Nxf6 Kg7 18. Ng4+ Kf8 19. Qh8+ Ke7 20. Qf6+ {
and mates next move.}) 17. Ne7# {[Chess Player's Chronicle, 1 May 1877]} 1-0
[Event "Simul"]
[Site "Montreal"]
[Date "1877.01.22"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Bird, Henry E"]
[Black "Barry, John"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C52"]
[Annotator "William H. Hicks"]
[PlyCount "88"]
[EventDate "1877.01.??"]
[EventCountry "CAN"]
[SourceDate "2009.02.21"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. b4 Bxb4 5. c3 Ba5 6. Qb3 Qe7 7. O-O h6 8. Ba3
d6 9. d4 Bb6 10. dxe5 Nxe5 11. Nxe5 Qxe5 12. Bxf7+ {This is an embarassing
move for Black.} Kf8 13. Bxg8 Rxg8 14. Nd2 Qe6 15. c4 Kf7 16. Kh1 Rf8 17. f4
Kg8 18. f5 Qf7 {Much care is required on both sides at this point.} 19. Rf3 {
19.Bb2 seems to be White's proper move here.} Bd4 20. Raf1 c5 21. Rh3 b6 22.
Bb2 Bf6 23. Rg3 Kh7 24. Bxf6 Qxf6 25. Rg6 Qe7 26. Qg3 Rf6 27. Rf4 Bd7 28. h4
Rg8 29. Rfg4 Be8 {Black's game is more hopeful than it was a few moves ago.}
30. Rxf6 Qxf6 31. Nf3 Bf7 32. Ng5+ Kh8 {If Black had attempted to win the
White knight he would have speedily lost the game.} 33. Nxf7+ Qxf7 34. Qxd6
Qxc4 35. f6 {A bad move of which Black takes immediate advantage.} Qf1+ 36. Kh2
Qxf6 37. Qc7 Qe6 38. Kg3 Qxa2 39. e5 Qb3+ 40. Kh2 Qe6 41. Rg3 Qf5 42. Qe7 Qf4
43. Kh3 a5 44. Rg4 Qf8 {The latter part of the game is carefully played by
Black. [Canadian Illustrated News, 19 May 1877.]} 0-1
[Event "Consultation game"]
[Site "Montreal"]
[Date "1877.01.23"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Henderson/Watkins/Hicks"]
[Black "Bird, Henry E"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B44"]
[Annotator "William H. Hicks"]
[PlyCount "93"]
[EventDate "1877.01.23"]
[EventCountry "CAN"]
[SourceDate "2009.02.21"]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Bd3 Nc6 6. Be3 d5 7. Nxc6 bxc6 8.
e5 Nd7 9. f4 Nc5 10. O-O Nxd3 11. cxd3 a5 12. d4 Rb8 13. Qc2 Qb6 14. b3 Ba6 15.
Rf3 g6 16. Nc3 Be7 17. Rc1 Bb7 18. Na4 Qa7 19. Nc5 Bxc5 20. Qxc5 Qxc5 21. Rxc5
Ra8 22. Bd2 a4 23. b4 Kd7 24. Rfc3 Rhc8 25. g4 Ba6 26. Kg2 a3 {The younger
player will perceive the effect of taking this pawn with rook. The advance of
this pawn was a bad move for Black.} 27. Ra5 Bc4 28. Rcxa3 Rxa5 29. Rxa5 Rc7
30. a4 h6 31. Ra8 Rc8 32. Rxc8 Kxc8 33. Kg3 Kd7 34. f5 h5 35. fxg6 fxg6 36.
gxh5 gxh5 37. Kf4 Be2 38. Kg5 Bg4 39. a5 Kc7 40. Kf6 Bf5 41. Ke7 h4 42. a6 Kb6
43. Kd6 Kxa6 44. Kxc6 Bd3 45. b5+ {The object of this move is very evident.}
Bxb5+ 46. Kd6 Kb7 47. Kxe6 {"and ultimately White wins." [Canadian Illustrated
News, 31 March 1877]} 1-0
[Event "Game - KN odds"]
[Site "Montreal"]
[Date "1877.01.29"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Bird, Henry E"]
[Black "Shaw, Joseph W"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Annotator "William H. Hicks"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKB1R w KQkq - 0 1"]
[PlyCount "99"]
[EventDate "1877.01.29"]
[EventCountry "CAN"]
[SourceDate "2009.02.21"]
1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Bc5 3. b4 Bb6 4. a4 a5 5. Ra3 Nf6 6. Rg3 Bxf2+ {A bold move in
a contest with a player of Mr. Bird's strength.} 7. Kxf2 Nxe4+ 8. Kg1 Nxg3 9.
hxg3 d5 10. Bd3 e4 11. Be2 axb4 12. Bb2 O-O 13. d3 Bf5 14. Nd2 c6 15. dxe4 Bxe4
16. Rh4 {A good move.} Qb6+ {Driving the White king into safe quarters.} 17.
Kh2 f5 18. Ba1 Rxa4 19. c4 Ra5 20. Nxe4 fxe4 21. Bd4 c5 22. Be5 d4 23. Rxe4 {
The last three or four moves of White are excellently played.} Qh6+ 24. Rh4 Qe3
25. Bd3 h6 26. Bf4 Qf2 27. Qh5 Ra1 {The game is very interesting at this point.
} 28. Qd5+ Kh8 29. Rxh6+ {A move that exposes the Black king to a ruinous
attack.} gxh6 30. Qe5+ Kg8 31. Qe6+ Rf7 32. Bh7+ Kh8 {The best defensive move.}
33. Qe8+ Kg7 34. Qg8+ Kf6 35. Qg6+ Ke7 36. Qd6+ Ke8 37. Qxb8+ Ke7 38. Qd6+ Ke8
39. Qe6+ Kd8 {Again the best defence.} 40. Qxf7 Qg1+ 41. Kh3 Qh1+ 42. Kg4 Qd1+
43. Kf5 Qc2+ 44. Kf6 Ra6+ 45. Kg7 Qe2 46. Bc7+ Kc8 47. Bf5+ Re6 48. Bd6 Kd8 49.
Qc7+ Ke8 50. Qc8# {[Canadian Ilustrated News, 17 March 1877]} 1-0
[Event "Simul"]
[Site "Montreal"]
[Date "1877.02.10"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Ascher, Jacob G"]
[Black "Bird, Henry E"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C21"]
[Annotator "William H. Hicks"]
[PlyCount "49"]
[EventDate "1877.01.??"]
[EventCountry "CAN"]
[SourceDate "2009.02.21"]
1. e4 e5 2. d4 exd4 3. Nf3 Bb4+ 4. c3 dxc3 5. bxc3 Bc5 6. Bc4 Qe7 7. O-O Nc6 {
7...h6 seems a necessary move here.} 8. e5 b6 9. Bg5 Qf8 {He has no other move,
and his game is very much cramped already.} 10. Re1 h6 11. Bh4 g5 12. Bg3 Nge7
13. Nbd2 Nf5 14. Ne4 {Looks promising.} Be7 15. Nd6+ {Better than checking at
f6.} cxd6 16. exd6 Nxg3 17. hxg3 Kd8 18. dxe7+ Nxe7 19. Ne5 Rh7 20. Qd3 f5 21.
Rad1 Ng8 {The only move.} 22. Qd5 {Winning a piece.} Kc7 23. Qxa8 Re7 24. Qxa7+
Bb7 25. Ba6 {[Canadian Illustrated News, 2 June 1877]} 1-0
[Event "Simul"]
[Site "Montreal"]
[Date "1877.02.10"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Hicks, William H"]
[Black "Bird, Henry E"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "D00"]
[Annotator "A.P.Barnes"]
[PlyCount "97"]
[EventDate "1877.01.??"]
[EventCountry "CAN"]
[SourceDate "2009.02.20"]
1. d4 d5 2. f4 {If White had commenced the game with 1.f4 and his opponent
replied 1...d5, would White have thought of answering with 2.d4? Yet that
position is produced by this move, which we regard with great disfavour. It
weakens the e-pawn terribly.} Nf6 3. e3 Bf5 {Nor do we like any better this
manner of bringing out the queen's bishop, which is more likely to render
effective service on its own side of the board.} 4. Nf3 h6 {This appears an
unnecessary precaution.} 5. Bd3 Bg4 6. O-O e6 7. c3 Bxf3 8. Qxf3 {8.gxf3
appears rather hazardous: but, considering the very backward state of Black's
game, it looks well worth attention. It certainly appears likely to give White
a most formidable centre of pawns, and Black's opportunities for attack are
not great. In any case, we think capturing with the rook would have been
better than doing so with the queen.} c5 9. Bc2 {Was there any occasion for
this retreat? Both players appear to lose time on one or two moves in the
opening.} Qb6 10. b3 Nbd7 11. f5 {A premature advance, which it appears should
have cost him the game.} e5 12. dxc5 Bxc5 13. b4 Bd6 14. Nd2 e4 {Black now
gains some advantage, and with ordinary care ought to win.} 15. Qe2 Qc7 16. h3
Qxc3 17. Nb3 Be5 {If, instead of this useless move, Black had played 17...Qe5,
White's reply is 18.g4 when Black can exchange queens, win another pawn safely,
and have a winning position - White's e-pawn being very weak.} 18. Rb1 Rc8 19.
Nc5 Nxc5 {Black, apparently, has delayed castling, fearing an attack on the
kingside: but at this point it appears to be imperative that he should wait no
longer, and, indeed, it also appears safe enough. The course he chooses soon
leads to disaster.} 20. bxc5 Qxc5 21. Ba4+ Ke7 {21...Kd8 is but little better.}
22. Rxb7+ Rc7 23. Rb5 Qc4 24. Ba3+ Bd6 25. Bxd6+ Kxd6 26. Qd1 Rhc8 27. Rb3
Qxf1+ {An ingenious attempt to retrieve the game, which is, however, foiled by
the correctness of White's play.} 28. Qxf1 {If 28.Kxf1 Black would probably
win. Mr. Hicks retains his queen very cleverly.} Rc1 29. Rb6+ axb6 30. Bd1 R8c2
31. Kh2 Rd2 32. Qf4+ Kc6 33. Ba4+ b5 34. Bb3 Rb2 {34...Rb1 appears to offer
more chances.} 35. Qb8 Rbb1 36. Qa8+ Kc5 37. Qf8+ Kb6 38. Qxf7 Rh1+ 39. Kg3
Rbe1 40. Kf4 Rhf1+ 41. Ke5 Rxe3 42. Qxg7 {Black might now have abandoned the
game.} Rxb3 43. Qxf6+ Ka5 44. axb3 e3 45. Qxh6 Re1 46. Kxd5 Rd1+ 47. Kc5 Rc1+
48. Kd4 Re1 49. Qxe3 {[Canadian Illustrated News, 30 June 1877]} 1-0
Contrary to modern practice, it is apparent that Bird and other masters of this era were willing to play black as well as white in simultaneous games.
Before he left Montreal Bird was fêted at a banquet held in his honour (see below for details of a similar dinner held for Mackenzie). For the
occasion the club's poet laureate, John Henderson, wrote the text for a song which he performed at the gathering. His original had specific references to
Bird, but it was the later generic version (i.e., with the references removed) that became famous and was published as far afield as Australia and England.
The tune was written by Allan Masterton to accompany Willie brew'd a peck o' maut
by Robert Burns.
The Royal Game
Brave knights of old, with spurs of gold,
On battle horse in panoply,
In tourney round or battleground,
Oft bit the dust most gallantly;
So do we yield on checkered field,
Or proudly our success relate -
The foe was brave, but could not save
His King from final check and mate.
Our Royal game, some call it tame,
They do not know its beauties rare;
For in the fight move king and knight,
With queens that are both dark and fair.
And where's the man who e'er would ban
The rapture - tongue can n'er relate -
The joy who'd miss, tis' almost bliss,
When we announce the smothered mate.
Yet some do hate this pretty mate,
And choose instead a stupid stale;
But none you'll find who hate the kind
That Adam chose in Eden's vale.
Then while we toast and while we boast
Our mastery in our sport most rare,
Hold with your checks, here's to the sex -
The best of mates the lovely fair.
Overall, the term most frequently applied to Bird by the Montreal press was 'genial.' He was not a full-time professional player but a highly-skilled amateur enjoying his
favourite indulgence: "In chivalry and enthusiasm for chess as a pastime, in pluck, and in readiness to play at a moment's notice for stakes or no stakes,
Bird had no equal." [Dictionary of National Biography] Bird's enthusiasm and enjoyment were contagious, and led to a shared genuine warmth and
admiration between himself and the Montreal club members. To quote H.G. Wells out of context (his essay is actually strongly anti-chess), "Compulsory
quick moving is the thing for gaiety, and that is why, though we revere Steinitz and Lasker, it is Bird we love."
[Certain Personal Matters] These feelings are evident in two letters
of thanks, published shortly after Bird's departure from Montreal [Canadian Illustrated News, 10 March 1877]:
I am directed by the members of the Montreal Chess Club to convey to you the high gratification you have afforded them during your late visit to this
city as their honoured guest. Never since the establishment of our club, extending over a period of twenty-five years, has there been awakened such a
genuine enthusiasm for the noble game as your presence inspired; and which circumstance the Club trusts will be an impetus to the Chess spirit of the
Dominion, tending to the development of a better knowledge and higher appreciation of the royal pastime which in the person of yourself has so brilliant
an exponent. That you may long be spared to enjoy the celebrity which you have so justly earned is our earnest wish.
I remain, my dear sir, with the highest esteem, very faithfully yours, Jacob G. Ascher.
I duly received your very kind and gratifying letter which I shall ever preserve, as one more remembrance of the delightfully charming associations
connected with my visit to Montreal. I know not how to adequately express my thanks for all your unbounded liberality. I must tax your kindness once
more by asking you to convey to your brother members of the Chess Club and circle the expressions of my sincere obligations. I may, I am sure, without
being invidious, be allowed to present my warm respects to Dr. Howe, Prof. Hicks and Mr. Saunders, the pleasure I have derived and the honour I feel at my
happy encounters with those gentlemen will ever be fondly remembered by me. To yourself personally what can I say for the many, many acts of kindness and
courtesy received at your hands. Mr. Shaw also, as well as Mr. Henderson, and Mr. Atkinson, you will kindly assure of my warmest friendship and admiration.
I must look forward to the pleasure of writing to each of them. Mr. Henderson's lines are highly appreciated. Hoping to write to you again soon, and
again sincerely thanking you,
I remain, my dear Mr. Ascher, yours very truly, H.E. Bird.
Postscript: Bird visited Montreal again in late May and June 1889, but this second visit received far less newspaper coverage. Attention
instead was concentrated on Joseph Blackburne, who was in the city at the same time giving simultaneous and blindfold displays, as we will see in the second
article in this series.
George Henry Mackenzie (1837-1891)
Almost exactly two years after Henry Bird's sojourn, Montreal received its second prominent chess visitor in the person of Captain George Mackenzie.
He is largely forgotten today (unlike Bird, he does not have an opening named after him), but in his day Mackenzie was regarded as U.S. champion for almost
two decades and at his peak was one of the top five players in the world. Scottish by birth, Mackenzie served in the British army in Ireland and India.
After resigning his commission he studied chess before coming to America in 1863 and joining the Union Army in the Civil War. Mackenzie was captain of a
Black infantry regiment; his adventures and misadventures as a soldier are quoted in this
article by John Hilbert. After the war Mackenzie settled
in New York and supported himself through chess. Between 1865 and 1880, with the exception of one drawn match, he won every American event he entered; by
winning the 2nd American Congress in 1871 he became U.S. champion (the retired Morphy had won the 1st Congress in 1857).
In the 1880s Mackenzie played frequently in Europe, integrating the recent positional innovations into his previous attacking style. According to
Steinitz, "new ideas made no impression on him until he had competed several times in European tournaments." He placed well at Vienna 1882, London 1883,
and Hamburg 1885, culminating with a first prize at Frankfurt am Main in 1887, ahead of Blackburne, Weiss, Tarrasch, Burn, and Zukertort. Mackenzie won the
Scottish championship in 1888 and tied for third with Bird behind Tarrasch and Blackburne at Manchester 1890, but by this point he was suffering from the
tuberculosis which resulted in his death the following year.
Captain Mackenzie arrived in Montreal on the morning of Friday, 3 January 1879, and departed just under two weeks later on 16 January. His stay was
organized by Joseph W. Shaw - "we must not forget to speak of the excellent arrangements of Mr. J.W. Shaw, upon whom devolved the consideration of all
matters relating to club preparation for the different contests and the general management of affairs during the Captain's visit." [Canadian Illustrated
News, 25 January 1879] All the public games were played in the room of the Montreal Chess Club, at the Gymnasium, corner of Mansfield and Burnside
Streets. Mackenzie gave five simultaneous exhibitions during his stay, as follows:
3 January 14 boards, +12 =1 -1
4 January 12 boards, +11 =1 -0
7 January 13 boards, +11 =0 -2
9 January - 11 players, +13(?) =4 -1
14 January 15 players +14 =1 -4
In the latter two displays, some participants played more than one game. Mackenzie contested individual games with members of the club on
January 4, 9, 11 and 12, losing only two games in all. At least one of the published games involved the giving of material odds (see below), but the press
reports give no indication how many such games were played. Shaw was fastidious in keeping track of the results: at the end of the two weeks Mackenzie
had played a total of ninety-five public games, scoring +78 =7 -10. Those who won against the Captain were Von Bokum (2), J.G. Ascher (2), Prof. Hicks,
J.W. Shaw, A. Skaife, Dr. H.A. Howe, John Barry, and C.S. Baker. The players who drew were T. Workman (3), A. Saunders (2), John Barry, and Prof. Hicks. The
merchant Hermann Von Bokum won his first two games against Mackenzie and there were plans to arrange a match between them, but Von Bokum's business concerns
didn't allow the necessary time. Mackenzie evened the score in his next two simul games with Von Bokum.
The player with the best score against the Captain was Thomas Workman, who in addition to the three drawn games played a
private match against Mackenzie and took three points from nine games, but given that Workman was hosting Mackenzie during his stay perhaps the latter was
generous.
The local experts felt that Mackenzie was a stronger player than Bird:
"As compared with the play of Mr. Bird the impression among our chess players is that Captain Mackenzie's play is steadier and shows more depth. It is
marked by brilliancy and originality, although he does not move as quickly as Mr. Bird. He gets beyond our powers entirely; they felt that it would require
a contest between him and such a player as Winawer or Blackburne or Zukertort to make them fully realize his skill at the game."
[Montreal Daily Witness, 4 January 1879] Of the games Mackenzie lost there were no crass blunders, the Montreal players had to work hard for their
victories:
[Event "Simul"]
[Site "Montreal"]
[Date "1879.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Mackenzie, George H"]
[Black "Ascher, Jacob G"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C30"]
[Annotator "W.N. Potter"]
[PlyCount "64"]
[EventDate "1879.01.07"]
[EventCountry "CAN"]
[SourceDate "2009.02.23"]
1. e4 e5 2. f4 Bc5 3. Nf3 d6 4. c3 ({I prefer} 4. Bc4) 4... Bg4 5. Be2 Nc6 6.
b4 Bxf3 7. Bxf3 exf4 {In an after conversation between the two players a
friendly dispute as to the merits of this continuation arose, Captain
Mackenzie contending that the sacrifice was unsound, and Mr. Ascher arguing
the other way. I cannot but take the Captain's view, while keeping my mind
open for the reception of a contrary belief if an analysis promised by Mr.
Ascher should establish his case. The aspect of the board is however
sufficient to show me that Black can obtain an attack, which, if not sound,
will be at any rate embarassing, especially to a player who has thirteen other
games to attend to.} 8. bxc5 Qh4+ 9. Kf1 O-O-O 10. Qe1 (10. cxd6 {followed by
d4 must be stronger.}) 10... Qf6 11. a4 dxc5 {Black has now a better position
than he is entitled to.} 12. a5 g5 13. a6 b6 14. h4 Rd3 15. Qe2 ({Not played
with the Captain's usual insight.} 15. hxg5 {followed, if} Qxg5 {by} 16. Qh4 {
, is undoubtedly the correct course here.}) 15... Ne5 16. hxg5 Qd6 {Black is
now firmly established, both for defensive and offensive purposes, while his
opponent is reduced to the role of a mere looker on.} 17. Na3 c6 18. Rb1 f6 {
A skillful display of carefulness founded on boldness. He is quite right not
to develop hastily his King's side pieces.} 19. g6 h6 20. Bg4+ Kc7 21. Bf5 Ne7
{All this is well timed.} 22. g7 Rg8 23. Rxh6 Rxg7 24. Rh8 f3 {Artistic, and
decisive of the issue for it forces the opponent to give up his queen.} 25.
gxf3 Rxf3+ 26. Qxf3 Nxf3 27. d4 cxd4 28. Ra8 Rg1+ 29. Ke2 Qh2+ 30. Kd3 {Mate
in two would follow the capture of the knight.} Ne5+ 31. Kxd4 c5+ 32. Ke3 Re1#
{[Westminster Papers, 1 March 1879]} 0-1
[Event "Simul"]
[Site "Montreal"]
[Date "1879.01.03"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Mackenzie, George H"]
[Black "Loverin, Nelson"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C29"]
[Annotator "Globe"]
[PlyCount "31"]
[EventDate "1879.01.07"]
[EventCountry "CAN"]
[SourceDate "2009.02.20"]
{"We give one of the games, to show the masterly manner in which the
redoubtable Captain winds up a comparatively weak opponent." [Globe]} 1. e4 e5
2. Nc3 Nf6 3. f4 exf4 4. e5 Qe7 5. Qe2 Ng8 6. Nf3 d6 7. Nd5 Qd8 8. exd6+ Be6 9.
Nxc7+ Kd7 10. Ne5+ Kc8 11. Nxe6 Qh4+ 12. Kd1 Bxd6 13. Qc4+ Nc6 14. Qxc6+ bxc6
15. Ba6+ Kb8 16. Nxc6# {[Globe, 11 January 1879]} 1-0
[Event "Simul"]
[Site "Montreal"]
[Date "1879.01.03"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Mackenzie, George Henry"]
[Black "Shaw, Joseph W"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C52"]
[PlyCount "51"]
[EventDate "1879.01.07"]
[EventCountry "CAN"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. b4 Bxb4 5. c3 Ba5 6. d4 exd4 7. O-O dxc3 8.
Qb3 Qf6 9. e5 Qg6 10. Nxc3 Bxc3 11. Qxc3 Nge7 12. Re1 O-O 13. Bd3 f5 14. Bb2
Kh8 15. Nh4 Qh6 16. g3 f4 17. Re4 fxg3 18. hxg3 d6 19. e6 Ne5 20. Rxe5 dxe5 21.
Qxe5 Ng6 22. Nxg6+ hxg6 23. Kg2 b6 24. Rh1 Bb7+ 25. Be4 Bxe4+ 26. Qxe4 {
[L'Opinion Publique, 30 January 1879.]} 1-0
[Event "Simul"]
[Site "Montreal"]
[Date "1879.01.07"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Shaw, Joseph W"]
[Black "Mackenzie, George H"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C67"]
[Annotator "Globe"]
[PlyCount "53"]
[EventDate "1879.01.07"]
[EventCountry "CAN"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O Nxe4 5. Re1 Nd6 6. Bxc6 dxc6 7. Nxe5 Be7
8. d3 {The first seven moves are according to book, but d4 is given for
White's 8th when the position is dismissed as being about equal.} O-O 9. h3 f5
10. f4 c5 {We think Black lost time by the move, and he might have got out one
of his pieces instead; the White N is awkwardly posted for Black, and 10...Bf6
seems better at this stage.} 11. b3 Nf7 12. Bb2 Bf6 13. Nd2 b5 14. Qf3 Bxe5 15.
Bxe5 Rb8 16. Bb2 {Very wisely played, preserving a strong position.} Rb6 17.
Qf2 Rg6 18. Re3 Bb7 19. Nf3 Nh6 20. Rae1 Kh8 {As White's next move completely
nullifies the attack of B and R, we should be inclined to capture the N.} 21.
Nh4 Ra6 22. Qg3 Raf6 23. Re7 {The proper move; White well maintains his
advantage.} Rg8 24. Qg5 Qd6 25. Bxf6 {It seems to us that White might have
forced mate by 25.Rxg7, etc.} Qxf6 26. Qxf6 gxf6 27. Rxc7 {[Globe, 18 January
1879; L'Opinion Publique, 30 January 1879]} 1-0
[Event "Simul"]
[Site "Montreal"]
[Date "1879.01.09"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Mackenzie, George H"]
[Black "Hicks, William H"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C15"]
[Annotator "Globe (G)/W.N. Potter (P)"]
[PlyCount "27"]
[EventDate "1879.01.07"]
[EventCountry "CAN"]
[SourceDate "2009.02.22"]
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 {(P) An inferior, and what is worse, a very
unsuccessful continuation. I do not wonder at 3...Nf6 being eyed askance since
the Paris Tourney. My own belief is that 3...Be7 is safest, though there are
objections to that, also arising from the facility it affords for the adverse
king knight to lodge on e5.} 4. Bd3 ({(P)} 4. exd5 {is now preferre d, and
rightly so. If the text move were White's best, I would support 3... Bb4.})
4... Ne7 {(G) 4...c5 leads to a better and freer game.} ({(P) Altogether
opposed to the principles of the French Defence.} 4... c5 {is the correct
continuation. The variation then goes on with} 5. exd5 Qxd5 6. Bb5+ Bd7 7.
Bxd7+ Nxd7 8. Nf3 cxd4 9. Qxd4 Qxd4 10. Nxd4 Bxc3+ {and Black has the
advantage.}) 5. Nf3 O-O 6. e5 Ng6 {(G) 6...f5 might be safely adventured.} 7.
O-O Bxc3 8. bxc3 b6 {(P) All this is very peculiar, to say the least of it. If
the learned professor wants to be beaten as quickly as possible, he gives the
right way to work in that behalf, most decidedly.} 9. Bg5 Qe8 10. h4 Nh8 {(G)
Black's position is very much cramped. 10...Nd7 looks as good a move for any.}
11. Bf6 g6 ({(G) Black's best play is to take the bishop, when White can
recover his piece as follows:} 11... gxf6 12. Qd2 Ng6 13. Qh6 Nd7 14. h5 {and
White must win the knight but at the expense of a pawn.}) 12. Ng5 Nd7 13. Qh5 {
(G) Every chess player must admire this masterly move. (P) A very pretty
wind-up, certainly, but this sherbet is too syrupy for my taste.} Nxf6 14. exf6
{[Globe, 2 February 1879; Westminster Papers, 1 March 1879]} 1-0
[Event "Game"]
[Site "Montreal"]
[Date "1879.01.11"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Mackenzie, George H"]
[Black "Shaw, Joseph W"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C42"]
[Annotator "Globe"]
[PlyCount "72"]
[EventDate "1879.01.15"]
[EventCountry "CAN"]
[SourceDate "2009.02.22"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nxe5 d6 4. Nxf7 {The invention of Mr. Cochrane, but
pronounced theoretically unsound by Wormold and others.} Kxf7 5. Bc4+ Be6 {5...
d5 is considered rather better.} 6. Bxe6+ Kxe6 7. d4 Kd7 {7...Kf7 is the
correct move here.} 8. Nc3 Qe7 9. O-O Nc6 {He would be safer to play 9...Kc8.}
10. e5 Ne8 11. Qg4+ {Profiting at once by his opponent's ninth move.} Qe6 12.
Qxe6+ Kxe6 13. d5+ Kxe5 14. dxc6 bxc6 15. Re1+ Kf6 16. Ne4+ Kg6 17. f4 h6 18.
g4 d5 19. Ng3 Bd6 20. Re6+ Kh7 {20...Kf7 seems better, and if 21.f5 then 21...
Bxg3, etc.} 21. Bd2 Nf6 22. g5 hxg5 23. fxg5 Ng4 24. g6+ Kg8 25. Rae1 Bc5+ 26.
Kf1 Rf8+ 27. Ke2 Rf2+ {Suppose 27...Rxh2+ followed by Bf2, he gains a piece or
the exchange.} 28. Kd1 Rhxh2 29. Re8+ Bf8 30. Bg5 Rxc2 31. Nf5 Rcf2 32. Ne7+
Kh8 33. Nxc6 Rhg2 34. Nd8 Nh2 35. Nf7+ Kg8 36. Be3 Rxb2 {Black's best move
seems to be Rc2. White announced mate in three moves. [Globe, 22 February 1879]
} 1-0
[Event "Game - QN odds"]
[Site "Montreal"]
[Date "1879.01.15"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Mackenzie, George H"]
[Black "Barry, John"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Annotator "Globe"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/R1BQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1"]
[PlyCount "71"]
[EventDate "1879.01.15"]
[EventCountry "CAN"]
[SourceDate "2009.02.22"]
1. e4 e6 2. f4 d5 3. e5 {This move (though condemned when following 2.d4) is
given as the best after 2.f4. And probably in the game at present odds this
variation by its blocking effect is good for the first player, as it tends to
defer exchanges till the game is better developed.} c5 4. Nf3 Nc6 5. c3 Qb6 {
A good post of vantage, and likely to prove troublesome to the adversary.} 6.
Bd3 Nh6 7. Bc2 Be7 8. O-O O-O 9. Kh1 f6 10. d4 cxd4 11. Qd3 g6 12. Bd2 fxe5 13.
Nxe5 {If 13.fxe5, Black replies 13...Nf5 at once.} Nxe5 14. fxe5 Rxf1+ 15. Rxf1
Nf5 16. cxd4 Qa6 {Altogether a lost move; he should get out his bishop and
other rook.} 17. Qf3 h5 {Well and wisely played.} 18. Bd3 Qc6 19. g4 hxg4 20.
Qxg4 Kf7 {20...Kg7 would defend the pawn - the text move loses it.} 21. Rg1 Ke8
22. Qxg6+ Kd7 23. Rc1 Qb6 24. Qf7 a5 {A step too far.} 25. a4 Nxd4 26. Be3 Qxb2
27. Bg6 Nc6 28. Qe8+ Kc7 29. Qxe7+ Bd7 30. Qd6+ Kc8 31. Rf1 {Very finely
played.} Nd8 {Black seems to have no move of merit left: 31...Nd8 seems as
good as any. The Captain remarked on this stage of the game that if Black had
played 31...Qe2 (a natural looking move) Whte would have had a very pretty
mate in four.} 32. Bb6 Qc3 33. Be8 Qc6 34. Bxd7+ Qxd7 35. Rc1+ Nc6 36. Qf8+ {
[Globe, 8 March 1879]} 1-0
As with Bird, the Montreal players held a banquet to celebrate the Captain's visit:
Last evening twenty gentlemen sat around a table at Compain's restaurant. In the centre stood a curious arrangement, which at once attracted attention,
and gave a fair idea of the object of the meeting. It was a huge chess board made of different coloured blocks of candy, in the centre of which stood an
enormous sugared knight as guardian of the scene, which, overweighted by its responsibility, fell before the evening was over... Nearly all bowed under the
weight of some classical name given in jest, but inspired by which they fought their battles over the chess board.
The substantials, of no mean order, were disposed of, sauced with jest, repartee and good humour, jokes enough being made to make the fortune of any
paragrapher. Then Dr. Howe, rising, addressed those present on the glories of chess... It was not until late years that an opportunity was given to
Canadians to play with masters of the art; but three [sic] years ago Mr. Bird came here, and there was present Captain Mackenzie who, distinguished
particularly by fertility of resource and rapidity in changing his attack to one side of the board if foiled at another, ranked with the very best
players in the world. For this reason, as other members of the club had been named after the classic heroes, he would christen him the Ulysses of chess.
The Club had its Nestor, its swift Ajax, its strong Ajax, and its Achilles they, and all the other heroes, would rejoice to do honour to the only Ulysses.
The health was drunk, and Capt. Mackenzie, rising to his feet, replied. Then toast after toast followed, and each reply was wittier than the former,
every one around the board performing his duty most efficiently, and at one o'clock all departed to their homes, thankful to their hosts, and well pleased
at the evening's pleasure. [Montreal Daily Witness, 9 January 1879]
John Henderson wrote and performed another song, this time in honour of his fellow Scot (to the tune "Canadians be Steady"):
Bold Champions of Caissa
Bold champions of Caissa hang up your bright shields,
To the festal board hasten away;
For awhile we'll abandon the strife and those fields
Where our forces met oft in the fray.
As of old 'tis our custom with laurel to crown
The hero who wins in the fight,
'Mongst those who now wear it for deeds of renown,
Is that champion - the guest of tonight.
When foemen assail and our hosts take the plain,
There the sons of Auld Scotia you'll find,
With their face to the foe or laid low with the slain,
For no craven belongs to their kind.
With a chieftain to lead through the thick of the fight,
To the strains that the highlanders played
When Jessie exclaimed in wild tones of delight,
"Hark! the Campbells are comin', we're saved!"
Now high among heroes 'neath Caissa's command,
In brave Captain Mackenzie we see
A son of the mountainous heather-clad land,
The chieftain this side of the sea.
Then here's to our guest and our right royal game,
'Tis the best and the oldest I ween,
For Adam found all were insipid and tame
Till he learned how to "mate" with a "Queen."
In addition, Henderson composed and dedicated a chess problem to Mackenzie. Problem composition was much more prevalent in the nineteenth century
than it is now, and there were frequent competitions with respectable prizes. The practice fell into disuse fairly quickly, but all the early Canadian
championships had adjunct problem-composing competitions associated with them.
John Henderson, 1879
Mate in three - key move
Postscript: in January 1880 Mackenzie tied for first in the 5th American Congress with one James Glover Grundy (he won the playoff 2-0).
Soon after, Grundy was invited to and visited the Toronto Chess Club, where he gave a simultaneous display and played several individual games; he did the same
in Hamilton immediately thereafter. However, charges of bribery involving Grundy emerged from the Congress, and he was subsequently banned from playing in
American events (see Jeremy Spinrad's two-part investigation at the ChessCafe website:
part 1,
part 2). The Toronto club was criticized for inviting a disgraced player; in response
the club cited timing in its defence, noting that the invitation was issued following the opinion of an initial tribunal which had exonerated Grundy. The
debate over the scandal was pursued in the press for several months, with the Globe backing away from the disreputable visitor. The chess column had
promised to publish a number of Mr. Grundy's Toronto games to demonstrate his strength, but amid the controversy they never made it into print. The 1880
American Congress is the only significant event we have a record of Grundy playing in, and he tied for first. After the scandal broke he disappeared from the
chess scene, although there are reports he played elsewhere under an assumed name.